Unless you’re blind or a moron, or sports just isn’t your bag, then you’ve already heard today that Major League baseball has decided to move the Montreal Expos to our great Nation’s Capitol, starting in the 2005 season. The team will play in RFK stadium next year and for the two seasons after that, while a brand new stadium is built for them. The word around town, in the papers, and on the news, and in the radio is one of mixed emotions. A few people are concerned that the proposed location for the stadium, in Southeast D.C. on the Anacostia River, as well as the price tag of $440 million, which the city will fund itself, will hurt Washington more than it will help. Most others, myself included, couldn’t be happier about the decision. Talk radio, not just sports talk radio, mind you, but all of the talk radio programs, have been talking D.C. baseball and nothing else non-stop all day. Finally, the citizens of Washington D.C. won’t have to drive up a cramped and crowded interstate for an hour to Baltimore to see America’s Pastime. And it gives me a chance to back a baseball team that I’m really excited about.
I’ve been a Mets fan for as long as I can remember. I’ve never been a really big fan though; I’ve always just had a passing interest. I didn’t sit up past my bedtime when I was nine watching the ‘86 Mets beat the Red Sox or anything like that. But when I was a kid, Jackson was home to the Jackson Mets, the N.Y. Mets AA farm club. We went to a few games, and I think that one day I just decided that the Mets were going to be my favorite baseball team. It’s hard to have a “passing interest” in a team though when the team sucks, as the Mets have for many, many, MANY years now. So I’m excited about the Expos/Senators/Grays/Whatevers coming to town, because it will give me a chance to get a fresh start, right along with the team, and follow them from the get go. I’m sure I’ll catch a lot of hell about this from my friends over the whole thing. I caught a lot of hell for saying that I was sort of taking a liking to the Redskins, and for playing with the ‘Skins when I play ESPN NFL 2005 on the Playstation. “What, you’re not a Saints fan anymore?”, they say. “You’re a traitor, that’s what you are”, is another good one. But I feel like this is different. I’ve never been to a Mets game. I don’t read Mets message boards like I do Saints message boards, and I don’t follow the team on an every day basis. Hitching my wagon to the new D.C. team is a way for me to enjoy baseball again, outside of a fantasy league. And it’s not like I’m a bandwagon fan, really. It’s the freakin’ Expos for crying out loud. So I’m making a fresh, new start. And I can’t wait for the D.C.-Atlanta series next year. The Braves will be our bitches! Whoever we are.
I say “whoever we are” because the biggest topic on talk radio today was what the name of the team was going to be when they moved. Not the financing, or who the ownership group was going to be, or if the city council would approve the move, or the new stadium, or if the team would be successful next year, or if they would even be able to complete the move in a single offseason. None of that. What’s really important was, “What are they going to be called?” The three front runners right now are the Expos, the Senators, and the Grays. The Expos would be easy, and cheap, because they could just wear the same uniforms and stuff from last year. But a lot of people don’t like it because they feel like the team needs a new start, and a new name should be included in that, and I tend to agree. The other two names have a very old school feel to them. The Senators is the name of the old Washington team, and to bring them back should mean to bring back the old name too. The only problem with that is that the Texas Rangers, who used to be the Washington Senators, own the rights to the name “Washington Senators”. Of course, Dubya Bush is the past owner of that team, so there’s been a lot of rumors goingn around that something could be worked out. We’ll see, though. The last name is the Grays, in honor of and in reference to the old Negro League team that played in the area. I like it, but I don’t know if it fits to well. I mean, “Washington Grays” just doesn’t really roll of my tongue, but I don’t know about you. I’m partial to the Senators, but I guess only time will tell.
More importantly though, is that there has been a lot of people calling in to various talk shows with there own ideas for names. These suggestions, good or bad, have started a lot of conversation in the area, and I think a few of them are really worth sharing. So here are five of the Best and Worst names for the new team that I have seen or heard so far…
5 Worst Names
- Washington Metros - reminds me of metrosexual. Not good.
- Washington River Rats - Yeah, lets play up the nastiness of the Anacostia and Potomac rivers.
- D.C. Filibusters - Riiiiiight.
- Washington Traffic Jams - Has too much of a basketball feel to it
- D.C. Snipers - Yes, someone actually suggested this. Not quite enough time passed to make jokes, I think.
5 Best Names
- Washington Senators - Classic, old school
- Washington Greys - See above
- D.C. Comics - stupid, but very, very funny
- D.C. Freedom - Corny, but people seem to like it
- Washington Monuments - Hilarious, Can’t you just see the uniforms?
Recent Comments